Executive Brief

EXECUTIVE BRIEF: Values-First SELF Acquisition Framework

Strategic Acquisition Guidelines for SELF Safety Technology

(Executive Summary – 5 Pages)

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Strategic Context

SELF (Support-First Logic Engine) represents a breakthrough in AI safety technology designed to prevent AI systems

from making emotional interactions worse. This executive brief outlines a comprehensive values-first acquisition framework t

hat ensures SELF technology is only transferred to organizations committed to ethical AI deployment and user safety.

Core Philosophy

Values transcend profit. The acquisition framework prioritizes ethical alignment, safety commitment, and user protection over

financial considerations. No transfer proceeds without rigorous evaluation and ongoing compliance monitoring.

Key Outcomes

Selective Partnerships: Only ethically-aligned organizations can acquire SELF
Risk Mitigation: Comprehensive clawback protections if safety claims prove false
Ongoing Accountability: Post-acquisition monitoring ensures continued values alignment
Market Integrity: Prevents dilution of safety standards through inappropriate commercialization

VALUES-FIRST SALES CRITERIA OVERVIEW

Evaluation Framework

The Values-First Sales Criteria establish mandatory requirements across nine critical dimensions:

1. Safety Commitment

15% minimum annual budget allocation to safety initiatives
C-level executive responsible for AI safety
Proven track record of prioritizing safety over business metrics

2. Ethical AI Principles

Implementation of IEEE/NIST ethical AI frameworks
Active bias mitigation and algorithmic accountability
Mandatory human oversight for high-risk applications

3. User Protection Focus

User safety as primary design constraint
Active harm prevention systems
Comprehensive user support and crisis response capabilities

4. Technical Safety Capability

Formal safety engineering training and processes
24/7 monitoring and rapid incident response
Industry-standard security controls and audit processes

5. SELF Integration Competence

Independent architecture review for integration planning
Comprehensive testing covering all SELF safety properties
Staff training on SELF safety principles and operation

6. Organizational Safety Culture

Performance evaluations include safety contributions
Safe reporting mechanisms for safety concerns
Post-incident analysis and continuous improvement processes

7. Regulatory Compliance

In-house regulatory compliance specialists
Clean audit records for past 3 years
Proactive compliance approach exceeding minimum requirements

8. Mission Compatibility

Business objectives compatible with safety mission
Public commitment to ethical AI development
Long-term vision prioritizing safety advancement

9. Resource Commitment

Financial stability and adequate engineering resources
Robust infrastructure for safety-critical operations
Commitment to scaling safety operations

Evaluation Process

4-Phase Assessment:

Initial Screening (1-2 weeks): Values declaration, background review, interviews
Due Diligence (2-4 weeks): Technical, financial, legal, and cultural evaluation
Deep Dive (2-4 weeks): On-site visits, technical demonstrations, scenario testing
Final Decision (1 week): Committee review with approval/conditional/denial outcomes

Approval Thresholds

Full Approval: Meets all criteria → standard licensing terms
Conditional Approval: Core criteria met with improvements needed → enhanced monitoring
Denial: Fails minimum criteria → transaction prohibited

BUY-SELL AGREEMENT STRUCTURE

Pricing Tiers

The agreement provides MAU-tiered commercial licensing for SELF Core, with optional Assurance Proof add-ons:

SELF Core (Non‑Exclusive, MAU‑Tiered) — Public List Pricing (USD)

Starter (≤ 5,000 MAU): $300/month
Growth (≤ 25,000 MAU): $750/month
Scale (≤ 100,000 MAU): $2,000/month
Enterprise (> 100,000 MAU): annual contract (starts at $36,000/year)

Assurance Proof (Optional Add‑On, Annual)

Lite: $7,500/year
Standard: $25,000/year
Enterprise: $75,000/year

This structure separates license (impact/MAU) from proof (review cadence and risk), so pricing cannot be “discounted” by quietly weakening safety operations.

Critical Preconditions

Values-First Evaluation: Agreement execution contingent upon successful completion of the comprehensive Values-First Sales Criteria evaluation. No rights vest until positive determination received.

Alignment Escrow Framework

Graduated Access Vesting: License keys and usage limits governed by neutral third-party escrow with 4-phase progression:

Phase 1 (Months 1-6): Limited production access + full monitoring rights
Phase 2 (Months 7-18): Expanded usage limits + active clawback provisions
Phase 3 (Months 19-36): Stable long-term license + protective covenants
Phase 4 (Month 37+): Renewed long-term standing (subject to ongoing compliance)

Escrow Agent Authority: Neutral custodian with binding dispute resolution power, continuous monitoring, and enforcement capabilities.

Release Triggers:

Immediate: Critical safety failures, alignment breaches, fraudulent reporting
Conditional: Performance deficiencies, resource reductions, cultural erosion
Normal: Successful phase completion, positive audit results, stakeholder approval

Safety Alignment Warranty

Verification Process: Independent third-party security audit, penetration testing, formal verification
Warranty Scope: SELF operates according to published specifications and design axioms
Duration: Covers the technology as delivered and documented

RISK MITIGATION FRAMEWORK

Clawback Provisions

Fundamental Protection: If safety claims prove false or materially misleading, ownership reverts to creator.

Trigger Conditions

Critical Safety Failure: Harm prevention mechanisms prove ineffective
Fundamental Design Flaw: Core axioms mathematically or practically unsound
Documentation Fraud: Intentional safety specification misrepresentations
Regulatory Non-Compliance: Failure to meet represented standards

Clawback Process

Notification (90 days): Written notice of alleged falsification
Independent Verification (30 days): Neutral expert panel review
Determination: Binding decision on falsification status
Remediation Period (90 days): Opportunity to address issues
Ownership Reversion: Full rights return to creator if unresolved

Clawback Scope

Complete IP rights reversion
Cessation of all buyer usage and derivative works
Destruction of all copies and implementations
No liability for buyer's prior usage

Values Divergence Protections

Post-Acquisition Monitoring:

Annual safety culture and commitment audits
Regular reporting on safety metrics and incident rates
Independent third-party safety assessments
Quarterly compliance reviews

Termination Triggers:

Failure to maintain Values-First compliance
Erosion of safety culture or commitment
Regulatory compliance deterioration
Mission divergence from safety principles

Dispute Resolution

Comprehensive Framework:

Negotiation (30 days): Good faith resolution attempts
Mediation (30 days): Neutral third-party facilitation
Arbitration (Final): Binding AAA-administered arbitration
Governing Law: [Jurisdiction] substantive law application

IMPLEMENTATION ROADMAP

Phase 1: Preparation (Months 1-2)

Legal Review: Professional counsel review of all documents
Process Documentation: Detailed procedures for evaluation and monitoring
Committee Formation: Assemble independent review board
Template Customization: Jurisdiction-specific legal adaptations

Phase 2: Initial Deployment (Months 3-6)

Pilot Evaluations: Test process with selected potential partners
Feedback Integration: Refine criteria based on initial experiences
Process Optimization: Streamline evaluation workflows
Stakeholder Communication: Educate potential partners on requirements

Phase 3: Full Operation (Months 6-12)

Active Acquisition: Execute first full evaluations and transfers
Monitoring Systems: Implement post-acquisition compliance tracking
Performance Analysis: Track evaluation outcomes and partner success
Process Refinement: Continuous improvement based on real-world application

Phase 4: Scaling (Year 2+)

Automated Tools: Develop evaluation support software
Global Expansion: Adapt for international markets and jurisdictions
Industry Partnerships: Collaborate with ethical AI organizations
Thought Leadership: Publish insights on values-first technology transfer

FINANCIAL PROJECTIONS

Revenue Model

SELF revenue is now primarily usage-based:

Monthly platform fees ($300 Standard / $500 Pro)
Metered usage billed per 1,000 conversations beyond included capacity
Forecasts depend on aggregate production conversation volume across licensees

Cost Structure

Legal/Compliance: $150K/year (external counsel, audits)
Evaluation Process: $200K/year (independent reviewers, tools)
Monitoring Systems: $100K/year (compliance tracking, audits)
Administrative: $50K/year (process management, documentation)
Total Annual Costs: $500K/year

Profitability Analysis

Profitability is driven by actual usage volume and the operating cost of governance; model this using expected conversation volume rather than upfront acquisition counts.

Scenario Planning

Base Case: 10 active production licensees with moderate usage growth
Conservative Case: 5 production licensees with lower usage and higher screening friction
Optimistic Case: 25 production licensees with higher usage, strong retention, and steady onboarding
Break-Even: Determined by governance operating costs versus aggregate metered usage

CONCLUSION & NEXT STEPS

Strategic Value Proposition

The Values-First SELF Acquisition Framework represents a pioneering approach to technology transfer that prioritizes safety, ethics, and user protection over short-term financial gain. By ensuring SELF technology reaches only organizations committed to responsible AI deployment, this framework:

Protects Users: Prevents safety-critical technology from being misused
Advances the Field: Sets new standards for ethical technology transfer
Mitigates Risk: Provides comprehensive clawback and monitoring protections
Creates Sustainable Value: Builds long-term partnerships with aligned organizations

Key Success Factors

Rigorous Evaluation: Maintain high standards for partner selection
Transparent Process: Clear communication about requirements and rationale
Continuous Improvement: Regular refinement based on experience and feedback
Strong Legal Foundation: Professional counsel ensures enforceability
Community Building: Foster relationships with ethical AI organizations

Immediate Actions Required

Legal Review: Engage qualified counsel for document review and customization
Process Development: Document detailed evaluation procedures and criteria
Committee Assembly: Form independent review board with diverse expertise
Communication Plan: Develop messaging for potential partners and stakeholders
Pilot Testing: Conduct initial evaluations to validate and refine process

Long-Term Vision

Establish SELF as the gold standard for responsible AI technology transfer, demonstrating that safety and ethics can drive commercial success while protecting users and advancing the field of AI safety.

Document Status: Draft for Executive Review

Classification: Internal Use Only - Contains Business Strategy

Review Date: [Date]

Approval Authority: Board of Directors

Effective Date: Upon Board Approval

Confidentiality: High - Contains Proprietary Acquisition Strategy

This executive brief provides strategic guidance for implementing a values-first acquisition framework for SELF technology. All projections and estimates are based on current market analysis and should be validated through professional financial and legal counsel.